USP Electronic Research Repository

Revisiting Ocean Boundary Disputes in the South Pacific in Light of the South China Sea Arbitration: A Legal Perspective

Song, Lili and Mosses, Morsen (2018) Revisiting Ocean Boundary Disputes in the South Pacific in Light of the South China Sea Arbitration: A Legal Perspective. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 33 (4). pp. 1-23. ISSN 1571-8085

[img] Microsoft Word - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (221Kb)

    Abstract

    This article examines three ocean boundary disputes in the South Pacific in light of the South China Sea arbitration. First, we consider whether the Matthew and Hunter Islands, over which France and Vanuatu have made competing claims, are full-fledged islands or rocks and argue that they are likely to be rocks. Second, we discuss the dispute between Fiji and Tonga over the Minerva Reefs. Based on public information that generally suggests the Minerva Reefs are lowtide elevations, we submit that Tonga’s historic claim to the maritime area around the Minerva Reefs is inconsistent with the principle of ‘the land dominates the sea’. Third, we examine Tonga’s historic claim to the maritime area within a rectangle boundary defined in Tonga’s 1887 Royal Proclamation and submit that the main difficulty for Tonga to establish such claim is to prove that it has effectively exercised sovereignty over the relevant area.

    Item Type: Journal Article
    Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
    Divisions: Faculty of Arts, Law and Education (FALE) > School of Law
    Depositing User: Lili Song
    Date Deposited: 01 May 2018 14:26
    Last Modified: 19 Mar 2019 14:47
    URI: http://repository.usp.ac.fj/id/eprint/10683
    UNSPECIFIED

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads

    More statistics for this item...