|   SOCIAL SCIENTISTS IN PARADISEMichael C. Howard
 Social science research in the South Pacific has had its ups and downs. depending on the vagaries of the world economy, wars and other geo-political considerations, academic fads, and the 
                                like. By and large, however, it can be argued that it has progressed - at least in terms of specialised complexity, the quantity of research and writing, and the range of theoretical perspectives represented. The 
                                South Pacific is no longer the preserve of a handful of anthropologists studying kinship and sexual practices and historians recording the glories of imperial expansion. The heterogeneity of social science research 
                                in the region has increased significantly over the past couple of decades. As a result, there are those who now feel that social science in the South Pacific has begun to exhibit a higher level of maturity, who 
                                believe that it is on the verge of moving beyond simple description, vaguely informed by theoretical concerns, to a more sophisticated plane. The articles in this special issue of the The Journal of Pacific Studies are drawn from the major fields within social science like history, anthropology, and geography, and to a lesser extent political sciences and economics, which have been present in the region over the years as well as from such relatively new fields of study as accounting, administration, and industrial relations.
                             
 TOWARDS A REVIEW OF HISTORY IN THE SOUTH PACIFICJacqueline Leckie
 On occasion Pacific historians have taken a break from the enthusiasm with which they pursue either the collection and interpretation of minutiae or the grand task of 
                                generalisation to address themselves to the nature of Pacific history and the direction in which this ever increasing collection of historical information can or should be 
                                heading. Some of the founding fathers in Pacific history have made their views known on the subject, notably J.W. Davidson (1966) and H.E. Maude (1971). While such 
                                writings have raised a number of issues pertinent to the srudy of Pacific history, they have failed to provide anything approaching a critical evaluation of the patterns and 
                                possible directions in the field. This is equally true of younger historians. Perhaps this is because Pacific historians, the majority of whom received their training at the 
                                Department of Pacific History at the Australian National University set up by Davidson, on the whole have been reluctant to break away from the tutelage of their 
                                old masters. Of course the scope for criticism of  the direction  of Pacific history has never been entirely closed, as indicated  by Oskar Spate (1978) in the festschrift 
                                dedicated to Maude. Spate pointed to a need for a wider perspective in the study of Pacific history, which he suggested be refferred to as `Oceanic history´. While 
                                Davidson himself was not immune to this approach, it would seem that much of the research and writing under his direction lost sight of this goal. `  A PRELIMINARY SURVEY OF ANTHROPOLOGY AND SOCIOLOGY IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC Michael C. Howard
 Anthropology developed as an academic discipline in the 19th century within th e context of European colonial expansion. Its roots, in a sense, are to be found in 
                                Victorian curiosity about the world and the pragmatic needs of colonial administrators and missionaries. In part because of this  anthropology began with something  od dual 
                                character, voyeuristic dilettantism on the one hand and concern with practical political goals on the other. Although the former orientation has tended to dominate the 
                                discipline , transformed  slightly into various theoretical fads to justify the existence of anthropology as a profession, the latter has always played a significant role as well. 
                                Common ground is to be found in a very narrow empiricism on the collection of minute detail. 
 “GEOGRAPHY.....THE NEXT MOST IMPORTANT SUBJECT ” J.J.H. Forster, J.J. Bryant, H.I. Manner
 W.C. Clarke and R.R. Thaman
 Geography  examines the relations between human society and the physical     environment. This concern, as well as geography´s reasonable claim to being the 
                                oldest social field of study, developing alogside geometry, geology, and geomancy, has led Kenneth Boulding to characterise geography as “the queen of the social 
                                sciences ”. The present , and more modest title and characterisation has a uniquely South Pacific context, as it comes from Alexander´s 1967 report, The University of the South Pacific, which stated: Because of its wide coverage and the relative ease of 
                                adaptation, at elementary levels, to the sepcific characteristics of the  area, Geography should be a full department from the beginning. After English and Mathematics it is perhaps the next most important subject.
                                POLITICAL SCIENCE IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC : A SURVEY OF THE LITERATURE AND AN AGENDA OF WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONERalph R. Premdas
 Political science within the South Pacific area is unevenly developed , substantially unsystematic, and  for the most part, irrelevant to the fundamental needs of these 
                                societies. Several factors explain this sad state of affairs. Prominent among them are the recent establishment of regional tertiary institutions, remoteness of the South 
                                Pacific from the main centres of intellectual discourse, and the intimate economic dependance of these societies on Western governments. While most Third world 
                                countries acceded to independence in the 1950´s and early 1960´s, European colonies in the South Pacific, apart from Western  Samoa which became free in 1962, 
                                started towards full sovereignty in 1968 when Nauru became independent, followed by Fiji and Tonga in 1970, by Niue in 1974, by Papua New Guinea in 1975, by the 
                                Solomon Islands and  Tuvalu i 1978, by Kiribati in 1979, and Vanuatu in 1980. Among the remaining colonies are American Samoa, New Caledonia, French Polynesia, and Irian Jaya. 
 THE STATE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THEORY IN THE SOUTH PACIFICH.M. Gunasekera and Ganeshwar Chand
 This paper is an attempt to review the literature on economic development in the South Pacific written during the past decade and a half. The paper is based on an 
                                examination of over one hundred and fifty pieces and reports. The list perused is by no means exhaustive, the authors’ input in this regard being constrained by their 
                                imperfect knowledge of and accessibility to existing works and by the limited time available. Naturally, we have not been able to make individual mention of all the 
                                works examined. In this task we have not been compelled to be selective, not only by the limitation of space but also by the fact that our main concern has been to classify 
                                these writings in terms of a certain set of series of development. Hence, those writings which we considered as forming only detailed aspects of these series have been mentioned only in passing.     
 ADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC: PERSPECTIVE AND PROBLEMS AREAS
 Roman Dubsky
 Administration as a field of theory and practice has increasingly moved in anew direction and new direction in the South Pacific. It is the aim of this study to identify 
                                this direction and examined the nature of changed that has occured in this field from the early 1970´s onward. Experienced in the region, like recent experienced in other 
                                developing areas, indicates considerable change in the nature of administrative systems and problems as a result of commitment of Pacific state to accelerated development. 
                                There has been, for exaple a vast extension in the activities of public institutions and similarly private organisations have assumed a growing importance in the context of 
                                development. Increasingly, the influence of advanced technology has made itself felt, affecting administrative practice. Such major changes in Pacific administrative systems 
                                both public and private, call for an appraisal of these systems as they are at present. This involves attempts to identify the new trends in administrative thought and practive 
                                and to redefine the role of adminstrative studies in the light of changing social and political conditions. 
 ACCOUNTING: A FIRST WORLD SYSTEM IN A THIRD WORLD SOCIETYL.Lyons, M. White and A. Naughton
 It is qite common for accountants, practitioners and academics alike to become so absorbed in the specific nature of each  task that confronts us that we easily lose sight 
                                of the overall role that the accountancy profession should play. This is a tendency that must be countered if accounting is to make the best contribution  possible to the 
                                development of society´s welfare. Accounting involves itself in reporting to entities of different types in different ways. 
 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS IN THE SOUTH PACIFICAnand Chand
 The purpose of this paper is to look at the topic of industrial relations in the  South Pacific region. Emphasis will be placed on the development of industrial relations, a 
                                survey of published literature , and some foresight of future trends. It can be said without doubt that industrial relations has been a neglected subject and what is 
                                available is mostly either too general or incomplete. Regional trade and unionists and officials from labour ministries have at intervals written skimpy papers. Lack of interest 
                                on the part of academics may be a reflection  of their conservatism as well as of their fear of putting their feet into so- called  dangerous waters. 
   |